When, in March 1988, the Soviet empire was beginning to disintegrate, details of secret, East-West negotiations were leaked to Pravda, and then to Moscow News, to the effect that “ten or twenty years ago,” a world government “could only have led to domination by American capitalism being enshrined in international law”.
However, the article continued, “the situation has changed. What has to be done is to establish a new international political order [for which] the socialist world is well prepared [because] the idea of internationalism is in the very nature of our [Communist] system of government”. What Moscow realised in 1988 was that globalism represented a final opportunity to rescue communist structures, if not communism itself, from collapse.
At the same time, the World Economic Forum, host to annual international summit meetings in Davos, launched, under the names of members of the Bilderberg Group and of the Trilateral Commission, a series of economic plans, to which Moscow was only too willing to subscribe. The aim of these plans was not to liberate Eastern European sovereignty and democracy, but to engineer, together with the USSR, the domination of Europe by a supranational regime. This aim was identical to that enshrined in the terms of the Soviet-German Treaty of 1939 – a correspondence, which is conveniently ignored by commentators today.
However, if we understand this correspondence, we can easily understand the words of Marcel Déat, as published, in 1943, under German supervision, in his daily newspaper, L’Œuvre [i.e. “The Task”] Déat said: “It is a question of creating one great European Economic State…The new Europe will either be socialist or it will not exist at all.”!

Here is the beginning of understanding the hidden history of modern Europe - not a Europe which could combine free countries while preserving their sovereignty (i.e. without imposing a supranational state) but that of Jean Monnet, whom the CIA financed in order to create a system of European governance, just like that which Walter Funk, the Nazi Minister of Finance, actually designed.

 

We were attending the annual Conference of the UKIP in Bristol, on October 2th-3th. We held a meeting on the fringe and made a speech:
When Nazis and Communists buried the Hatchet, they planted a poisonous seed, which has Grown into The CFR and later into Brussels’s Europe.

For decades, the so-called “Fathers of Europe”, Jean Monnet, Robert Schuman, Jacques Delors, and others, spread their hatred of sovereignty and democracy through their powerful adherents in the media, and kept quiet about themselves and their ‘godfathers’ in the Fabian Society, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission and so on; namely, Joseph Retinger, Otto Abetz, Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, Ernst Aschenbach, Paul-Henry Spaak, Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, David Rockefeller et cetera, all of whom have worked, in effect, to blend Nazi pan-Europeanism with Communist Internationalism to create the global, oligarchic, corporate system, we see emerging today.
As shown in the Congressional Record - on 15 December 1987, Jesse Helms dropped a bombshell in the US Senate. He denounced “the State Department, the Trade Department, certain banking and financial groups, multinationals and tax-exempt foundations [saying that they were effectively controlled by] organisations such as the CFR, the RIIA, the Trilateral Commission, the Dartmouth and Bilderberg Meetings, the Aspen Institute and the Atlantic Insititute”, which are, he said, “using them to spread and coordinate plans for a so-called New World Order, serving the business and financial channels of the political world…

Indeed, Senator Helms, whose high degree in Freemasonry, suddenly became a matter of dispute with the Grand Order, ventured to go further still. On the morals of what he called “this secret system of government”, he said, “The world views of these insiders are characterised by atheism and materialism. All that matters to them is to maximise their profits, by wielding the twin-weapons of debt and monopoly. That is absolutely not true capitalism, and it is not surprising if the insiders of these clubs - while vying with each other – are also plotting together to join forces with Kremlin leaders, whose vision of the world is also that of atheistic, materialistic profiteers.

 

Helms also described what he called “the destructive role of Fabian socialism”, specifically deploring the fact (and I quote) “that Europe has lost its identity and sense of mission as a bastion of Western civilisation, whereas Marxism, in all its forms, is replacing the culture and the traditional values of the nations of the Old World”.
How is it possible that so few people know about these powers and their role in shaping Europe and the World since the War?
There are two reasons: the first is that foreign correspondents in the United States, are snowed under by government press-releases and trivia, and rarely find time to examine the Congressional Record, let alone to listen to speeches in the Senate or House of Representatives.

The second, and more cogent, reason is apparent from a speech, given in Essen, West Germany, on 8th June 1991, by David Rockefeller, the President of the Bilderberg Group, and of the Trilateral Commission, and one of those who control the media through their financial interests. He said:
We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been quite impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, now that the world is more sophisticated, it is prepared to march towards a world government and accept the supranational sovereignty of an intellectual and financial elite, which is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries…
Only a few publications, of very limited circulation, or else this book I’ve just published entitled Facts & Chronicles denied to the public, written by Pierre de Villemarest, a former member of the Special Services for French National Defence, reported this astounding statement, while, among the “great publications” referred to by Rockefeller were the newspapers of record of all the European Union member states, whose eminent columnists – some of them Members of Parliament - preferred not to protest about the censorship imposed by this man and his accomplices, but to continue to allow themselves to be led, together with an ignorant public, on a forced “march towards a one-world government”.

 

For more than fifty years, the self-appointed “Wise Men” of these plutocratic “Clubs” steadfastly ignored the atrocities perpetrated by the precursor of the Europe of Brussels - the USSR. Under cover of a silence imposed by them, the nomenklatura, who were so admired by Monnet and Delors, were able to impose their “new socialist order” upon 100 million slaves - and murdered as many more.
During an official visit to Bucharest, the then President of France, Valéry Giscard d’Estaing (a Bilderberg-attendee since 1968) took the opportunity of assuring the Communist boss, Ceaucescu, as follows: “We have identical ideas about the problems facing the world, and they are in line with a New Economic World Order”. (Le Figaro, 28 July 1975). Giscard made almost the same comment to Brezhnev after placing flowers at Lenin’s tomb, as the first Western Head of State to pay tribute to the man who, in founding the Cheka, created the first, modern police-state.
It was at about this time that Alexander Solzhenitsyn miraculously succeeded in breaking through the blanket of silence in the West and in denouncing the Empire of the Gulag. After that, other survivors of the death camps, such as the Russian Vladimir Bukovski, drove the point home by pointing out that the East-West détente, so desired by the globalists, was built upon a hundred million corpses. When challenged about his motives for saying this, Vladimir Bukovski replied, with wonderful, Russian wit and succinctness: “I am neither from the revolutionary camp, nor from the reactionary camp - I am from the concentration camp.
In 1981 during a television programme in France (Apostroph by Bernard Pivot) a dialogue has happened between Mr. Bukovski and the French actress Simone Signoret. As you may recall, Mitterand has just won his first Presidency, and huge crowds of French youth were noisily celebrating in the streets of Paris. ("We will have jobs! We will have new appartments!" etc) . Mr. Bukovski  was presenting his new book (Cette lancinante douleur de la liberté) which, quite appropriately for the moment, was highly critical of European socialists. So, he said that this celebrating youth is going to be mighty disappointed very soon, because all the socialist promises  are nothing but a dream. That is when Simone Signoret said:
"You do not have the right, Sir, to destroy the illusions of the young people who expect so much from socialism!".
We may wonder how she dared to bid him keep silence about the horrors he had witnessed*; but such is the fervour of the utopian elite that truth and justice – let alone sovereignty and democracy – mean nothing to them at all. I would love to know what Bukovski said in reply.
We want a Europe of freedom, not a Europe of Signoret’s “illusions”, because, unless we get it, Europe, like yesterday’s USSR, will become a spiritual, intellectual and moral cemetery, where soulless racketeers hold sway.
* He laughed in reply. He also said: "Don't you think it is extremely cruel  and even dangerous to raise their expectation so much, only to be dumped within a year?"
Of course, this was exactly what happened within a year when Mitterand had to abandon his socialist plans and turned to a more realistic policies.